Every case brings its own unique challenges, and the story behind this victory was no exception. From the very beginning, we understood the complexities of the situation and the stakes involved. Our client, David Okafor, came to us with a legal issue that required not only a deep understanding of the law but also a carefully crafted approach to achieve the desired outcome.
At the heart of our success was strategic preparation. We began by meticulously analyzing the case, gathering evidence, and building a strong foundation for our arguments. Every document was reviewed, every witness was vetted, and every possible scenario was anticipated. Our team worked tirelessly to ensure no detail was overlooked. By combining our legal expertise with a commitment to thoroughness, we were able to construct a compelling case that left no room for doubt.
important was the skilled advocacy we demonstrated throughout the process. Whether in negotiations or the courtroom, we were unwavering in our pursuit of justice. Our arguments were clear, precise, and backed by facts. We countered every challenge with confidence and ensured that our client’s voice was heard. The opposition quickly realized they were up against a team that would settle for nothing less than fairness and truth.
Since the decision of the Court of Appeal in Obafemi Awolowo University v Onabanjo,[1] the law regarding the status of an employee, whose employment is neither confirmed nor terminated after serving out the probationary period, seems well settled in Nigeria. Such an employee is deemed to have been confirmed by the operation of law based …
significance of determining whether an employee has been confirmed or not lies in the manner of bringing the employment contract to an end, and the benefits to which the employee may be entitled. Usually, the notice period for termination is often shorter, and the termination process less cumbersome, during the probation period compared to post confirmation period. For instance, in employments with statutory flavor, there is often an elaborate procedure for terminating an employee whose appointment has been confirmed, which is not the case during the probationary period.
Christopher Katbong’s case was a prime example of the power of perseverance and dedication in the pursuit of justice. From the outset, the odds seemed stacked against him. The case presented numerous complexities that required a deep understanding of the law, as well as a strategic approach to overcome the challenges. Christopher placed his trust in us, and we were determined to deliver a fair and just result.
Our team approached the case with unwavering focus, leaving no stone unturned. We began by meticulously analyzing the details, uncovering key evidence, and building a robust legal strategy. Every argument we crafted was backed by solid facts and presented with clarity and precision. Throughout the process, we remained steadfast, ensuring that Christopher’s rights were protected and his voice was heard.
The opposition brought strong counterarguments, but we were prepared for every challenge. Our skilled advocacy, combined with an in-depth understanding of the case, allowed us to dismantle every point of contention. We ensured that Christopher’s story was presented in the most compelling way, highlighting the fairness and justice he deserved.
The result was a resounding victory. Christopher’s case proved that hard work, focus, and dedication pay off. Justice was served, and the outcome restored his confidence in the legal system. This case not only marked a significant win for Christopher but also reaffirmed our commitment to delivering results for our clients.
The rise of virtual assets and digital exchanges has introduced innovative ways of conducting financial transactions. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) is responsible for overseeing the registration and licensing of Virtual Asset Service Providers (“VASPs”), Fintech Innovators, and other Digital Investments Service Providers (“DISPs”). To protect investors, maintain market integrity, and prevent financial crimes, the Commission has established regulatory frameworks that outline the specific requirements these service providers must fulfill in order to operate legally in Nigeria.
The Order is rooted in the broader context of Nigeria’s electricity sector reforms, which began with the unbundling of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria Plc. (PHCN). This unbundling was part of a strategic initiative to privatise the successor GenCos and DisCos to enhance efficiency and service delivery in the power sector. The Electric Power Sector Reform Act (EPSRA) established a framework to create a bulk trading company, tasked with serving as an interface for GenCos and DisCos. This was required to make it possible to buy capacity and energy up until the DisCos could get the necessary creditworthiness to enter into Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs).
Ozekhome said this on Thursday in Abuja at the 2024 Conference of the National Association of Judiciary Correspondents (NAJUC).
According to him, Nigeria may collapse without a functional judiciary system.
charged the judiciary to live up to expectations in ensuring that their judgements reflect justice and not based on technicalities.
Expert Guidance, Proven Results – Let Us Advocate for You.
Email us at dominicadejoh@nigerianbar.ng
Get in Touch – We’re Here to Assist You with Your Legal Needs.